En Banc
- Chevron on Stilts: A Response to Jonathan Siegel
PDF Philip Hamburger
72 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 77 (2018) - Documenting Bankrupted Slaves
PDF Rafael I. Pardo
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 73 (2018) - Going Private: Climate Action by Businesses and Individuals
PDF Daniel A. Farber
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 197 (2018) - Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data
PDF Paul Schiff Berman
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 11 (2018) - Commodified Promises and Contract Theory
PDF Brian H. Bix
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2018)
Responses
- Chevron on Stilts: A Response to Jonathan Siegel
PDF Philip Hamburger
72 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 77 (2018) - Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data
PDF Paul Schiff Berman
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 11 (2018) - Commodified Promises and Contract Theory
PDF Brian H. Bix
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2018)
Corporate Bulletins
- Chancery Court Declares Corwin is not a “Massive Eraser” for all Fiduciary Wrongdoing
PDF Robert S. Reder
72 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 93 (2018) - Delaware Supreme Court Once Again Reverses Dismissal of Fiduciary Breach Claims Brought Against Target Company Directors
PDF Robert S. Reder
72 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 71 (2018) - Chancery Court Determines That 22.1% Stockholder Controls Corporation, Rendering Corwin Inapplicable
PDF Robert S. Reder
72 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 61 (2018)
Featured Symposium
The Vanderbilt Law Review and Professor Brian Fitzpatrick are pleased to announce the 2017 Vanderbilt Law Review Symposium: The Future of Discovery. This year’s Symposium will take place on Friday, October 13, 2017 at Vanderbilt Law School. The Symposium will feature three panels of scholars discussing their recent work in the area of e-discovery, a keynote address delivered by U.S. District Judge Paul W. Grimm, and a round-table discussion with sitting federal judges to consider advances in and future challenges of discovery. The Symposium is open to practicing attorneys, and CLE credit will be available.
Other Vanderbilt Symposiums
Featured Roundtable
This Roundtable considers Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, which will be argued before the Supreme Court on November 2, 2015. In Spokeo, the Court will consider whether Congress may confer Article III standing upon plaintiffs who suffer no concrete injury by vesting them with a private right of action to enforce a statutory requirement. The case may have broad-reaching impacts upon standing doctrine because a decision for the petitioner would substantially restrict Congress's ability to provide for enforcement of statutory rights when they are not accompanied by an "injury in fact." At its heart, Spokeo is a separation-of-powers case focused on the tension between Congress’s legislative power to create rights and enforcement mechanisms and the Court’s power to define and enforce Article III’s standing requirements.
Current Publication
Vanderbilt Law Review
Volume 71, Number 5
Articles
-
Adam N. Steinman,
Access to Justice, Rationality, and Personal Jurisdiction,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1401 (2018) -
Kent Barnett, Christina L. Boyd & Christopher J. Walker,
Administrative Law’s Political Dynamics,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1463 (2018) -
Christopher R. Leslie,
Hindsight Bias in Antitrust Law,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1527 (2018) -
Thomas Ward Frampton,
The Jim Crow Jury,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1593 (2018)
Notes
-
Ahsin Azim,
Common Sense: Rethinking the New Common Rule’s Weak Protections for Human Subjects,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1703 (2018) -
Madison T. Santana,
Trafficked in Texas: Combatting the Sex-Trafficking Epidemic Through Prostitution Law and Sentencing Reform in the Lone Star State,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1739 (2018)