En Banc
- Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data
PDF Paul Schiff Berman
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 11 (2018) - Commodified Promises and Contract Theory
PDF Brian H. Bix
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2018) - Ambiguities and Agency Cases: Reflections After (Almost) Ten Years on the Bench
PDF Honorable Raymond M. Kethledge
70 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 315 (2017) - Neutral Principles and Political Power: A Response to Reverse Political Process Theory
PDF Matthew A. Seligman
Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 301 (2017) - Lost in Transplantation: The Supreme Court’s Post-Prudence Jurisprudence
PDF Adam N. Steinman
70 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 289 (2017)
Responses
- Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data
PDF Paul Schiff Berman
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 11 (2018) - Commodified Promises and Contract Theory
PDF Brian H. Bix
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2018) - Neutral Principles and Political Power: A Response to Reverse Political Process Theory
PDF Matthew A. Seligman
Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 301 (2017)
Corporate Bulletins
- Delaware Court Summons Corwin to Dismiss Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Grounded in Allegations of Director Self-Interest in Connection with Merger
PDF Robert S. Reder & Miron Klimkowski
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 145 (2018) - Delaware Court Determines Corwin Not Available to “Cleanse” Alleged Director Misconduct Due to “Structurally Coercive” Stockholder Vote
PDF Robert S. Reder & Victoria L. Romvary
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 131 (2018) - Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Dismissal of Fiduciary Breach Claims Against Target Company Directors
PDF Robert S. Reder & John L. Daywalt
71 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 123 (2018)
Featured Symposium
The Vanderbilt Law Review and Professor Brian Fitzpatrick are pleased to announce the 2017 Vanderbilt Law Review Symposium: The Future of Discovery. This year’s Symposium will take place on Friday, October 13, 2017 at Vanderbilt Law School. The Symposium will feature three panels of scholars discussing their recent work in the area of e-discovery, a keynote address delivered by U.S. District Judge Paul W. Grimm, and a round-table discussion with sitting federal judges to consider advances in and future challenges of discovery. The Symposium is open to practicing attorneys, and CLE credit will be available.
Other Vanderbilt Symposiums
Featured Roundtable
This Roundtable considers Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, which will be argued before the Supreme Court on November 2, 2015. In Spokeo, the Court will consider whether Congress may confer Article III standing upon plaintiffs who suffer no concrete injury by vesting them with a private right of action to enforce a statutory requirement. The case may have broad-reaching impacts upon standing doctrine because a decision for the petitioner would substantially restrict Congress's ability to provide for enforcement of statutory rights when they are not accompanied by an "injury in fact." At its heart, Spokeo is a separation-of-powers case focused on the tension between Congress’s legislative power to create rights and enforcement mechanisms and the Court’s power to define and enforce Article III’s standing requirements.
Current Publication
Vanderbilt Law Review
Volume 71, Number 3
(April 2018)
Articles
-
F. Andrew Hessick,
Consenting to Adjudication Outside the Article III Courts,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 715 (2018) -
Paul R. Gugliuzza & Mark A. Lemley,
Can a Court Change the Law by Saying Nothing?,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 765 (2018) -
Alexandra D. Lahav,
Procedural Design,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 821 (2018)
Notes
-
Nell Henson,
A Taste of Their Own Medicine: Examining the Admissibility of Experts’ Prior Malpractice Under the Federal Rules of Evidence,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 995 (2018) -
Danielle J. Reid,
Combating the Enemy Within: Regulating Employee Misappropriation of Business Information,
71 Vand. L. Rev. 1033 (2018)